|
Homepage
To leave blog please click back button on your browser to return to
main site.
|
A GOVERNMENT WITHIN A
GOVERNMENT?
Following on from questions raised by Deputy Bob Hill
– this being with regard to the decision of the Chairman of PPC to
refuse to investigate the concerns of the suspended Chief Police Officer
over the actions of some involved in his suspension - at next week’s
States sitting the JDA’s Deputy Trevor Pitman will ask the following
question of the Chief Minister:
“Did a meeting led by the Chief Executive take place after the CMB
(Corporate Management Board) meeting of 25th July 2007 to discus matters
relating to the Minister for Health and Social Services and, if so, who
was present at the meeting, was the possible removal from office of the
Minister discussed and, if so, would the Chief Minister suspend all
those present from their duties pending a full investigation into this
matter”.
Deputy Pitman told us: “these concerns have rumbled on for far too long.
Having already personally asked questions last year about the alleged
political and senior civil service involvement in the ‘Operation Blast’
case; and only last week seen serious concerns again expressed over the
suspension of the Chief Police Officer, the allegations that attempts
were made to remove a Minister from position in 2007 must finally be
answered and a full independent investigation take place.”
Deputy Pitman added: Having now been shown a copy of the original file
note document where the suspended Chief Police Officer states that he
felt an attempt was made to draw him ‘into a civil service led attempt
to remove a Minister from office’ I have to ask the question as to how
those allegedly involved cannot have been suspended while this is
independently investigated.
We are told that suspension is ‘a neutral act’ yet Mr. Power has now
been suspended for some 14 months. Until such time as he is ever found
guilty of any charge he is an innocent man. Thus to any self-respecting
democratic government the concerns he expressed back in 2007 must be
taken seriously and the matter acted upon. If not, then we can only
conclude that the concerns raised by Deputy Hill are well founded. The
fact that the Minister at the centre of this happens to be Senator
Syvret; and the rights or wrongs of any of his subsequent actions are
wholly irrelevant”
|