JDA logo

 

 

 

 

From Christine Papworth

 

 

 

 

To Home Page

 

 

 

 

 Politics

 

 

To leave blog please click back button on your browser to return to main site.

 

 

 

 

Christine PapworthChristine decided to become politically active after seeing the way our politicians are completely out of touch with the needs of the majority of ordinary Jersey people. By ignoring the 20,000 people who signed the anti-GST petition, the ministers were shown to be, in the words of Alan Breckon, "morally bankrupt". Her politics are based on a passionate belief in social justice and human rights for all.

 

She would like to see more accountability, openness and honesty in the way that Jersey is governed.  Her aims are ensuring proper provision is made by the States for our increasingly elderly population, the young to have their own homes or be housed adequately, reform of income support and a society which protects and supports children and families, building on the services already in existence.

 

"I never forget how difficult life can be for low and middle-income families. The daily struggle to provide a decent life for our own families is a constant worry for many. As a mother of three children myself, I am well aware of how difficult it is to support children through education and into work.Whilst I understand the importance of the finance industry to our local economy, I would like to see more government support for small local businesses, especially in the provision of training and apprenticeships for our young people."

 

More Lies from Senator Le Sueur

Over the past few weeks the chairman of the Jersey Chamber of Commerce has made statements to the effect that the “black hole” in our revenue has been caused by overspending by the States. He was supported by Mr. David Kern, the Chief Economist of the British Chamber of Commerce.


The island’s chief minister then joined in the chorus, blaming overspending by the States for our fiscal deficit and insisting that he had constantly been calling for restraint in spending.


It is surprising that our chief minister should support such ill-informed comment. The figures for the last seven years shows that our revenue has totalled £3.8 billion and the cost of running the island has been £3.3 billion—a budget surplus of £500 million. If capital projects of £365 million are added in Jersey is still £135 million in front. This figure includes paying cash of £108 million for the incinerator- in retrospect a rather foolish decision


Far from constantly calling for restraint, Senator Le Sueur, on several occasions, has praised the States for their responsible attitude towards spending. Nowhere in the financial reports presented to the States from 2003 to 2010 has there been any or criticism from him about States spending. The reason, of course, is that Jersey has not been overspending, despite the claims of the Chamber of Commerce.


Just to remind your readers what Senator Le Sueur has said during the presentations of his Budget reports:
• 2003 “ financial discipline was exercised over the General Reserve Fund resulting in 24.6 million of the 27.7 million allocation being spent.”
• 2004 “States expenditure grew by less than the rate of inflation, reflecting the real strides that have been made to put the brakes on what may have been regarded as the spending excesses of the past”.
• 2006 “we ended the year within budget. In a year of significant financial pressure, this was an excellent result”
• 2007 “spending rose by3.3%. Not only was this increase less than the rate of inflation but it was also the smallest increase in States spending in the last 20 years.” So why does the Chief Minister side with the Chamber of Commerce to push forward this totally untrue scenario of overspending on to the public of Jersey?. One can only assume that it is because he still wishes to hide from the public that the real cause of the” fiscal black hole” is the disastrous zero-ten tax policy that he pushed through with former Senator Frank Walker and Senator Ozouf


We , the people of Jersey, are paying for that mistake in cuts in services, jobs losses and increased taxation.